Disciplina Discipline ADM4001
Teorias Organizacionais
Organizational Theories

Área de Concentração: 11153

Concentration area: 11153

Criação: 14/12/2020

Creation: 14/12/2020

Ativação: 14/12/2020

Activation: 14/12/2020

Nr. de Créditos: 8

Credits: 8

Carga Horária:

Workload:

Docente Responsável:

Professor:

Luciano Mendes

Objetivos:

O objetivo da disciplina é apresentar as diversas teorias que utilizadas nos estudos organizacionais, tais como: teoria contingencial, teoria da ecologia organizacional, teoria institucional, teoria da economia organizacional, teoria da aprendizagem organizacional, teoria crítica e teoria pós-moderna, dentre outras teorias mais atuais.

Objectives:

The aim of the course is to present the various theories used in organizational studies, such as contingency theory, theory of organizational ecology, institutional theory, theory of organizational economics, theory of organizational learning, critical theory and postmodern theory, among other, more current theories.

Justificativa:

A disciplina de teorias organizacionais é obrigatória no curso de mestrado em administração. É uma disciplina essencial para os Programas de Pós-graduação em Administração, pois permite que os alunos compreendam parte das teorias que contemplam a compreensão das organizações e também das ações organizadas.

Rationale:

The discipline of organizational theories is required in the master's degree in administration. It is an essential discipline for Programs of Postgraduate Management, it allows students to understand theories that consider the understanding of organizations and also of organized actions.

Conteúdo:

Estudar as principais vertentes teóricas no âmbito dos estudos organizacionais, apresentar as diferenças em termos epistemológicos e paradigmáticos entre teorias, histórico sobre as teorias administrativas e organizacionais; e concepções teóricas atuais nos estudos organizacionais.

Content:

Studying the main theoretical aspects in the context of organizational studies shows differences in epistemological and paradigmatic terms of theories, administrative history and organizational theories; and current theoretical conceptions in organizational studies.

Forma de Avaliação:

Artigo científico para publicação Prova escrita Seminários Resenhas críticas

Type of Assessment:

Scientific article for publication Written test Seminars Critical reviews

Bibliografia:

ARNAUD, G. The contribution of psychoanalysis to organization studies and management: an overview. Organization Studies, v. 33, n. 9, p. 1121-1135, 2012. BAKKEN, T.; HERNES, T. Organizing is both a verb and a noun: Weick meets Whitehead. Organization Studies, v.27, n.11, p.1599-1616, 2006. BEYES, T.; STEYAERT, C. Spacing organization: non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization, v. 19, n. 1, p. 45-61, 2012. BOURDIEU, P. O poder simbólico. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 1998. CLEGG, S. R.; HARDY, C.; NORD, W. R. (Orgs.) Handbook de estudos organizacionais. São Paulo: Atlas, 2004 (Vol. 1, 2 e 3) CLEGG, S.; DUNKERLEY, D. Organization, class and control. New York: Routledge, 2013. DiMAGGIO, P. J.; POWELL, W. W. A gaiola de ferro revisitada: isomorfismo institucional e racionalidade coletiva nos campos organizacionais. Revista de Administração de Empresas - RAE, v.45, n.2, p.74-89, 2005. DOKKO, G.; KANE, A. A.; TORTORIELLO, Marco. One of us or one of my friends: How social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organization Studies, v. 35, n. 5, p. 703-726, 2014. DYE, K.; MILLS, A. J.; WEATHERBEE, T. Maslow man interrupted – reading management theory in context. Management Decision, v.43, n.10, p.1375- 1747, 2005. FOUCAULT, M. Vigiar e punir: história da violência nas prisões. 25a ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2002. GARVIN, D. A. The processes of organization and management. Sloan management review, v. 39, 2012. GUERREIRO RAMOS, A. A Nova Ciência das Organizações: uma reconceituação da riqueza das nações. Rio de Janeiro/RJ: FGV, 1981. HATCH, M. J. Organization theory: modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2012. KILDUFF, M.; DOUGHERTY, D. Change and development in a pluralistic world: the view from the classics. Academy of Management Review, v.25, n.4, p.777-782, 2000. PEAUCELLE, J. From Taylorism to Post-Taylorism simultaneously pursuing several management objectives. Journal of Organizational Change Management, v.13, n.5, p.452-464, 2000. KODEIH, F.; GREENWOOD, R. Responding to institutional complexity: The role of identity. Organization Studies, v. 35, n. 1, p. 7-39, 2014. LAMPEL, J.; HONIG, B.; DRORI, I. Organizational Ingenuity: Concept, Processes and Strategies. Organization Studies, v. 35, n. 4, p. 465-482, 2014. MCKINLAY, A.; CARTER, C.; PEZET, E. Governmentality, power and organization. Management & Organizational History, v. 7, n. 1, p. 3-15, 2012. PARKER, L. D.; RITSON, P. Fads, stereotypes and management gurus: Fayol and Follet today. Management Decision, v.43, n.10, p.1335-1357, 2005. SCOTT, W. R. et al. Institutional environments and organizations: structural complexity and individualism. London: Sage, 1994. SLAGER, R.; GOND, J.; MOON, J.. Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies, v. 33, n. 5-6, p. 763-790, 2012. SØRENSEN, B. M. Changing the memory of suffering: An organizational aesthetics of the dark side. Organization Studies, v. 35, n. 2, p. 279-302, 2014. TRAGTENBERG, M. Sobre educação, política e sindicalismo. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2004. WEBER, M. Economia e sociedade. Brasília: UnB, 2004. WEICK, K. E. Making sense of the organization: the impermanent organization. Vol. 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2012. WEICK, K. E. Sensemaking in organization. London: Sage, 1995. ZHANG, J.; LUO, X. D. Dared to Care: Organizational Vulnerability, Institutional Logics, and MNCs’ Social Responsiveness in Emerging Markets. Organization Science, v. 24, n. 6, p. 1742-1764, 2013.

Bibliography:

ARNAUD, G. The contribution of psychoanalysis to organization studies and management: an overview. Organization Studies, v. 33, n. 9, p. 1121-1135, 2012. BAKKEN, T.; HERNES, T. Organizing is both a verb and a noun: Weick meets Whitehead. Organization Studies, v.27, n.11, p.1599-1616, 2006. BEYES, T.; STEYAERT, C. Spacing organization: non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization, v. 19, n. 1, p. 45-61, 2012. BOURDIEU, P. O poder simbólico. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 1998. CLEGG, S. R.; HARDY, C.; NORD, W. R. (Orgs.) Handbook de estudos organizacionais. São Paulo: Atlas, 2004 (Vol. 1, 2 e 3) CLEGG, S.; DUNKERLEY, D. Organization, class and control. New York: Routledge, 2013. DiMAGGIO, P. J.; POWELL, W. W. A gaiola de ferro revisitada: isomorfismo institucional e racionalidade coletiva nos campos organizacionais. Revista de Administração de Empresas - RAE, v.45, n.2, p.74-89, 2005. DOKKO, G.; KANE, A. A.; TORTORIELLO, Marco. One of us or one of my friends: How social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organization Studies, v. 35, n. 5, p. 703-726, 2014. DYE, K.; MILLS, A. J.; WEATHERBEE, T. Maslow man interrupted – reading management theory in context. Management Decision, v.43, n.10, p.1375- 1747, 2005. FOUCAULT, M. Vigiar e punir: história da violência nas prisões. 25a ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2002. GARVIN, D. A. The processes of organization and management. Sloan management review, v. 39, 2012. GUERREIRO RAMOS, A. A Nova Ciência das Organizações: uma reconceituação da riqueza das nações. Rio de Janeiro/RJ: FGV, 1981. HATCH, M. J. Organization theory: modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2012. KILDUFF, M.; DOUGHERTY, D. Change and development in a pluralistic world: the view from the classics. Academy of Management Review, v.25, n.4, p.777-782, 2000. PEAUCELLE, J. From Taylorism to Post-Taylorism simultaneously pursuing several management objectives. Journal of Organizational Change Management, v.13, n.5, p.452-464, 2000. KODEIH, F.; GREENWOOD, R. Responding to institutional complexity: The role of identity. Organization Studies, v. 35, n. 1, p. 7-39, 2014. LAMPEL, J.; HONIG, B.; DRORI, I. Organizational Ingenuity: Concept, Processes and Strategies. Organization Studies, v. 35, n. 4, p. 465-482, 2014. MCKINLAY, A.; CARTER, C.; PEZET, E. Governmentality, power and organization. Management & Organizational History, v. 7, n. 1, p. 3-15, 2012. PARKER, L. D.; RITSON, P. Fads, stereotypes and management gurus: Fayol and Follet today. Management Decision, v.43, n.10, p.1335-1357, 2005. SCOTT, W. R. et al. Institutional environments and organizations: structural complexity and individualism. London: Sage, 1994. SLAGER, R.; GOND, J.; MOON, J.. Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies, v. 33, n. 5-6, p. 763-790, 2012. SØRENSEN, B. M. Changing the memory of suffering: An organizational aesthetics of the dark side. Organization Studies, v. 35, n. 2, p. 279-302, 2014. TRAGTENBERG, M. Sobre educação, política e sindicalismo. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2004. WEBER, M. Economia e sociedade. Brasília: UnB, 2004. WEICK, K. E. Making sense of the organization: the impermanent organization. Vol. 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2012. WEICK, K. E. Sensemaking in organization. London: Sage, 1995. ZHANG, J.; LUO, X. D. Dared to Care: Organizational Vulnerability, Institutional Logics, and MNCs’ Social Responsiveness in Emerging Markets. Organization Science, v. 24, n. 6, p. 1742-1764, 2013.

Tipo de oferecimento da disciplina:

Presencial

Class type:

Presencial