Geral: Adquirir uma visão de conjunto sobre a diversidade de animais, sua origem entre os eucariotos unicelulares, as relações entre os principais grupos de metazoários e suas implicações para a compreensão da evolução das características fisiológicas, comportamentais e ecológicas dos vários grupos.Específico: A disciplina deverá resultar na compreensão do bauplan dos vários filos animais, e das modificações a partir desse plano básico para chegar à condição de seus principais subgrupos. A visão tradicional de ensino de Zoologia nos diversos níveis acadêmicos implica na apresentação, grupo por grupo, dos filos animais e de suas características diagnósticas. Isso resulta na ausência de percepção sobre a ligação entre os filos e do processo gradual de aquisição das características dos grupos até chegar no ancestral de cada filo e de seus subgrupos até chegar nas espécies atuais. Este disciplina pretende introduzir uma visão temporal da diversidade animal, permitindo a integração de conceitos aprendidos em biologia celular, histologia, bioquímica, fisiologia, morfologia, etologia e ecologia animal.
1. Posição dos Metazoa na diversidade de eucariotos. 2. Filogenia de Metazoa – visão geral. 3. Plano-básico de Porífera e modificações para alcançar as classes. 4. Plano-básico de Cnidaria e modificações para alcançar as classes principais. 5. A posição central de Ctenophora na evolução da bilateralidade. 6. Origem dos Deuterostomia: monofilia ou parafilia de Protostomia?. 7. Parafilia de Platyhelminthes e a origem de Bilatéria. 8. Nemertea e a evolução do celoma. 9. Plano-básico de Mollusca e modificações para alcançar as classes. 10. Parafilia de Annelida, parafilia de Polychaeta, posição de Ecdysozoa. 11. Filogenia de Arthropoda. 12. Parafilia de Lophophorata, evolução de Echinodermata e origem dos cordados.
AGUINALDO, A.M.A.; J.M. TUBERVILLE; L.S. LINFORD; M.C. RIVERA; J.R. GAREY; R.A. RUDOLF & J.A. LAKE. 1997. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature, 387: 4489-4493.ALMEIDA, W.O. & M.L. CHRISTOFFERSEN. 1999. A cladistic approach to relationships in Pentastomida. Journal of Parasitology, Kansas, 85(4): 695-704.ALMEIDA, W.O. & M.L. CHRISTOFFERSEN. 2002. Análise cladística dos grupos basais de Metameria: Uma nova proposta para o posicionamento dos Arthropoda e grupos afins entre os poliquetos errantes. 2ª Edição. Series Teses, Dissertações & Monografias, I. Holos, Ribeirão Preto, 76p.AMORIM, D.S. 2002. Fundamentos de sistemática filogenética. Holos, Ribeirão Preto, XVIII + 154p.ANDERSON, D.T. 1982. Origins and relationships among the animal phyla. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 106(2): 151-166.ARENDT, D. & K. NÜBLER-JUNG. 1994. Inversion of dorsoventral axis? Nature, 371: 26.ARENDT, D. & K. NÜBLER-JUNG. 1997. Dorsal or ventral: similarities in fate maps and gastrulation patterns in annelids, arthropods and chordates. Mechanisms of Development, 61: 7-21.BALAVOINE, G. 1997. The early emergence of plathelminths is contradicted by the agreement between 18S rRNA and Hox genes data. Comptes Rendus de l’ Academie des Sciences de Paris, Sciences de la Vie, 320: 83-94.BALAVOINE, G. 1998. Are Platyhelminthes coelomates without a coelom? An argument based on the evolution of Hox genes? American Zoologist, 38: 843-858.BALLARD, J.W.O., G.J. OLSEN; D.P. FAITH; W.A. ODGERS; D.M. ROWELL & P.W. ATKINSON. 1992. Evidence from 12S ribossomal RNA sequences that onychophorans are modified arthropods. Science, 258(5086): 1345-1348.BARTOLOMAEUS, T. 1999. Sructure, function and development of segmental organs in Annelida. Hydrobiologia, 42: 21-37.BARTOLOMAEUS, T. & P. AX. 1992. Protonephridia and metanephridia – Their relation within the Bilateria. Zeitschrift für Zoologische und Systematisch Evolutionsforschung, 30: 21-45.BRINKHURST, R.O. 1984b. Comments on the evolution of the Annelida. Hydrobiologia, 109: 189-191.BRINKHURST, R.O. 1989. A phylogenetic analysis of the Lumbriculidae (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67(11): 2731-2739.BRINKHURST, R.O. 1991a. A phylogenetic analysis of the Tubificinae (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69(2): 392-397.BRINKHURST, R.O. 1991b. A phylogenetic analysis of the Phreodrilidae (Annelida, Oligochaeta) with a description of a new species. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69(8): 20131-2040.BRINKHURST, R.O. 1992b. Evolutionary relationships within the Clitellata. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24(12): 1201-1205.BRINKHURST, R.O. 1994. Evolutionary relationships within the Clitellata: An update. Megadrilogica, 5(10): 109-112.BRUSCA, R.C. & G.J. BRUSCA. 1990. Invertebrates. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 992p.CHRISTOFFERSEN, M.L. & E. ARAÚJO-DE-ALMEIDA. 1994. A phylogenetic framework of the Enterocoela (Metameria: Coelomata). Revista Nordestina de Biologia, João Pessoa, 9(2): 173-208.CLARK, R.B. 1963. The evolution of the coelom and metameric segmentation, p. 91-107. In: E.C. DOUGHERTY; Z.N. BROWN; E.D. HANSON & W.D. HARTMAN (Eds.). The lower Metazoa: comparative biology and phylogeny. University of California Press, Berkeley.DZIK, J. & G. KRUMBIEGEL. 1989. The oldest ‘onychophoran’ Xenusion: A link connecting phyla? Lethaia, 22: 169-181.EERNISSE, D.J. 1997. Arthropod and annelid relationships re-examined, p. 43-56. In: R.A. FORTEY & R.H. THOMAS (Eds.). Arthropod relationships. The Systematics Association Special Volume 55. Chapman & Hall, London.EERNISSE, D.J.; J.S. ALBERT & F.E. ANDERSON. 1992. Annelida and Arthropoda are not sister taxa. A phylogenetic analysis of spiralian metazoan morphology. Systematic Biology, 41(3): 305-330.EIBYE-JACOBSEN, D. & C. NIELSEN. 1996. The rearticulation of annelids. Zoologica Scripta, 25(3): 275-282.ERWIN, D.; J.W. VALENTINE & D. JABLONSKI. 1997. The origin of the animal body. American Scientist, 85: 126-137.FAUCHALD, K. 1974. Polychaete phylogeny: a problem in protostome evolution. Systematic Zoology, 23: 493-506.FAUCHALD, K. 1977. The polychaete worms. Definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. Natural History Museum, Los Angeles County Science Series, 28: 1-188.FAUCHALD, K. & G.W. ROUSE. 1997. Polychaete systematics: Past and present. Zoologica Scripta, 26: 71-138.FIELD, K.G.; G.J. OLSEN; D.J. LANE; S.J. GIOVANNONI; M.T. GHISELIN; E.C. RAFF & R. RAFF. 1988. Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science, 239: 748-753.FITZHUGH, K. 1989. A systematic revision of the Sabellidae-Caobangiidae-Sabellongidae complex (Annelida: Polychaeta). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 192: 1-104.FRYER, G. 1996. Reflections on arthropod evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 58: 1-55.FRYER, G. 1998. A defense of arthropod polyphyly, p. 23-33. In: R.A. FORTEY & R.H. THOMAS (Eds.). Arthropod relationships. The Systematics Association Special Volume 55. Chapman & Hall, London.GIRIBET, G. & C. RIBERA. 1998. The position of arthropods in the animal kingdom: a search for a reliable outgroup for internal arthropod phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 9: 481-488.GIRIBET, G. & C. RIBERA. 2000. A review of arthropod phylogeny: new data based on ribosomal DNA sequences and direct charactes optimization. Cladistics, 16(2): 204-231.HENNIG, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 263p.HYMAN, L.H. 1951. The invertebrates: Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela. Volume 1. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 726p.HYMAN, L.H. 1959. The invertebrates: Smaller coelomate groups. Volume. 5. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 783p.IVANOV, A.V. 1957. On the systematic position of Pogonophora. Systematic Zoology, 15: 165-173.IVANOV, A.V. 1963. Pogonophora. Academic Press, London, XVI + 479p.JONES, C.M. & J.C. SMITH. 1995. Revolving vertebrates. Current Biology, 5: 574-576.KIM, C.B.; S.Y. MOON; S.R. GELDER & W. KIM. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships of annelids, molluscs, and arthropods evidenced from molecules and morphology. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 43: 207-215.MANTON, S.M. 1952. The evolution of arthropodan locomotory mechanisms. Part 2. General introduction to the locomotory mechanisms of the Arthropoda. Journal of the Linnean Society of London Zoology, 42: 93-117.MANTON, S.M. 1967. The polychaete Spinther and the origin of the Arthropoda. Journal of Natural History, 1: 1-22.MANTON, S.M. 1969. Evolution and affinities of Onychophora, Myriapoda, Hexapoda, and Crustacea, p. 15-57. In: R.C. MOORE (Ed.). Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology Part R Arthropoda. Volume 4, The Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, Lawrence.MANTON, S.M. 1973. Arthropod phylogeny – A modern synthesis. Journal of Zoology, London, 171: 111-130.MANTON, S.M. 1977. The Arthropoda: habits, functional morphology and evolution. Oxford University Press, London, XX + 527p.MILEIKOVSKY, S.A. 1968. A morphology of larvae and systematics of Polychaeta. Zoologichesky Zhurnal, 47(1): 59-59.MOURA, G. & M.L. CHRISTOFFERSEN. 1996. The system of the mandibulate arthropods: Tracheata and Remipedia as sister groups; ‘Crustacea’ non-monophyletic. Journal of Comparative Biology, Ribeirão Preto, 1(3/4): 95-113.NIELSEN, C. 1995. Animal evolution: Interrelationships of the living phyla. Oxford University Press, Oxford, X + 467p.NÜBLER-JUNG, K. & D. ARENDT. 1994. Is ventral in insects dorsal in vertebrates? A history of embryological arguments favouring axis inversion in chordate ancestors. Roux’s Archives of developmental Biology, 203: 357-366.NÜBLER-JUNG, K. & D. ARENDT. 1999. Dorsoventral axis inversion: Enteropneust anatomy links invertebrates to chordates turned upside down. Journal of zoological and Systematic evolutionary Research, 37: 93-100.PETERSON, K.J.; R.A. CAMERON & E.H. DAVIDSON. 2000a. Bilaterian origins: significance of new experimental observations. Developmental Biology, 219: 1-47.PETERSON, K.J. & E.H. DAVIDSON. 2000. Regulatory evolution and the origin of the bilaterians. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Scienceof the United States of America, 97(9): 4430-4433.PHILIPPE, H.; A. CHENUIL & A. ADOUTTE. 1994. Can the Cambrian explosion be inferred through molecular phylogeny? Development, Supplement, 120: 15-25.PILATO, G. 1981. The significance of musculature in the origin of the Annelida. Bolletino di Zoologia, 48: 209-226.ROUSE, G.W. 1997. Rearticulating Annelida with extra assumptions: A response to Eibye-Jacobsen and Nielsen. Zoologica Scripta, 26(1): 61-66.ROUSE, G.W. 1999. Trochophore concepts: ciliary bands and the evolution of larvae in spiralian Metazoa. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 66: 411-464.ROUSE, G.W. 2000. The epitome of hand waving? Larval feeding and hypotheses of metazoan phylogeny. Evolution & Development, 2(4): 222-233.ROUSE, G.W. & K. FAUCHALD. 1995. The articulation of annelids. Zoologica Scripta, 24(4): 269-301.ROUSE, G.W. & K. FAUCHALD. 1997. Cladistics and polychaetes. Zoologica Scripta, 26(2): 139-204.ROUSE, G.W. & K. FAUCHALD. 1998. Recent views on the status, delineation and classification of the Annelida. American Zoologist, 38(6): 953-964.SALVINI-PLAWEN, L.V. 2000. What is convergent/ homoplastic in Pogonophora? Journal of zoological Systematics and evolutionary Research, 38(3): 133-147.SCHRAM, F.R. 1986. Crustacea. Oxford University Press, New York, XVI + 606p.SCHRAM, F.R. 1991. Cladistic analysis of metazoan phyla and the placement of fossil problematica, p. 35-46. In: A Simoneta & S. Conway Morris (Eds.). The early evolution of Metazoa and the significance of problematic taxa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridige.SCHRAM, F.R. & M.J. EMERSON. 1991. Arthropod pattern theory: A new approach to arthropod phylogeny. Memories of the Queensland Museum, 31: 1-18.SCHRÖDER, P.C. & C.O. HERMANS. 1975. Annelida: Polychaeta, p. 1-213. In: A.C. GIESE & J.S. PEARSE (Eds.). Reproduction of marine invertebrates. Vol. 3. Academic Press, New York.SCHWEIGKOFLER, M.; T. BARTOLOMAEUS & L.V. SALVINI-PLAWEN. 1998. Ultrastructure and formation of hooded hooks in Capitella capitata (Fabricius, 1780) (Capitellida, Annelida). Zoomorphology, 118: 117-128.SHUBIN, N.; C. TABIN & S. CARROLL. 1997. Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature, 388: 639-648.VALENTINE, J.W. 1989. Bilaterians of the Precambrian-Cambrian transition and the annelid-arthropod relationship. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Science, U.S.A., 86: 2272-2275.WÄGELE, J.W. 1996a. The theory and methodology of phylogenetic systematics is still evolving: A reply to Wilson. Vie et Milieu, 46(2): 183-184.WÄGELE, J.W. 1999. Major sources of errors in phylogenetic systematics. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 238: 329-337.WÄGELE, J.W.; T. ERIKSON; P. LOCKHART & B. MISOF. 1999. The Ecdysozoa: Artifact or monophylum? Journal of zoological Systematics and evolutionary Research., 37: 211-223.WÄGELE, J.W. & B. MISOF. 2001. On quality of evidence in phylogeny reconstruction: a reply to Zrazvý’s defense of ‘Ecdysozoa’ hypothesis. Journal of zoological Systematics and evolutionary Research, 39: 165-176.WALTON, L.B. 1927. The polychaete ancestry of the insects. American Naturalist, 61: 226-250.WESTHEIDE, W.; D. MCHUGH; G. PURSCHKE & G.W. ROUSE. 1999. Systematization of the Annelida: different approaches. Hydrobiologia, 402: 291-307.WEYGOLDT, P. 1986. Arthropod interelationships: The phylogenetic-systematic approach. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematic und Evolutionsforschung, 24(1): 19-35.WILLMER, P. 1990. Invertebrate relationships. Patterns in animal evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 400p.WINNEPENNINCKX, B.; T. BACKELJAU & R.M. KRISTENSEN. 1998. Relationships of the new phylum Cycliophora. Nature, 393: 636-638.ZRZAVÝ, J.; S. MIHULKA; P. KEPKA; A. BEZDEK & D. TIEZ. 1998. Phylogeny of Metazoa based on morphological and 18S ribossomal DNA evidence. Cladistics, 14(3): 249-286.
